Independent AI security assessment

Know where your AI risk is real—and what to do next.

Norsyn examines governance, architecture, data, third parties, attack paths, human oversight, and operational resilience. The result is an executive-ready view of risk supported by evidence, not a generic checklist.

THE DECISION IN VIEW

Questions the assessment is built to answer.

Security, risk, technology, legal, and operations leaders who need a defensible view before deployment, expansion, procurement, audit, or board review.

01

Can this system be manipulated, misused, or made to disclose protected information?

02

Are responsibilities, approvals, and risk decisions documented clearly enough to defend?

03

Do vendor claims, model controls, and data boundaries hold up under evidence review?

04

Which weaknesses matter most to the business, and which actions should come first?

WHAT YOU RECEIVE

Evidence leaders can use.

Norsyn makes the risk understandable without flattening the technical detail that supports it.

01

Executive risk briefing

02

System and data-flow context map

03

Threat model and attack-path analysis

04

Governance and control evidence review

05

Risk-ranked findings with supporting evidence

06

90-day and longer-term remediation roadmap

07

Framework and readiness crosswalks where relevant

08

Optional remediation validation and reassessment

HOW NORSYN WORKS

Context first. Evidence throughout. Action at the end.

The depth changes with the system and consequence. The discipline does not.

01

Scope the decision

Define the system, intended use, data, actors, dependencies, consequence, and decision the work must support.

02

Examine the evidence

Review governance, architecture, access, data, model, supplier, testing, monitoring, and incident evidence.

03

Validate the risk

Use threat modeling and proportionate technical testing to challenge the most consequential scenarios.

04

Make action clear

Translate findings into business impact, priority, owner, timing, residual risk, and a practical roadmap.

THE RESULT

A stronger basis for the next decision.

  • A shared, evidence-based view of the most consequential risks
  • Clear ownership and sequencing for remediation
  • Decision support for launch, procurement, expansion, or risk acceptance
  • Reusable evidence for executives, customers, auditors, and oversight teams

COMMON QUESTIONS

Before we begin.

Is this a penetration test?

Not by default. The assessment combines governance and evidence review with threat-informed technical validation. Testing depth is scoped to the system, available access, safety constraints, and decision.

Do we need a mature AI governance program first?

No. Norsyn can assess an early program, one proposed use case, or an operating system. The method is tailored to your maturity and next decision.

Does the assessment certify compliance?

No. Norsyn provides independent assessment, gap analysis, and readiness support. The work does not replace legal advice, an accredited certification body, a regulator, or an independent audit.

What is the typical investment?

A focused baseline diagnostic begins at $12,500. A full AI Security Posture Assessment is commonly $45,000–$85,000, with a typical engagement around $60,000. High-consequence, multi-entity, or OT scope may begin around $85,000.

START A CONVERSATION

Make the next AI decision with evidence in hand.

A confidential 20-minute fit call can clarify the decision, scope, and assessment depth that make sense.

Request a fit call